On February 10 this year, transport minister Anthony Loke introduced that Malaysian motor vehicle highway tax and driver’s licenses have gone digital, enabling checks to be performed on the MyJPJ cell application and thus no for a longer period necessitating the bodily road tax sticker to be adhered to the vehicle’s windscreen.
It has emerged, even so, that the law enforcement have ongoing issuing summonses to drivers of personal motor vehicles which do not have the physical road tax sticker displayed on their windscreen.
UPDATE: A refresh of the Facebook posting by Faiz Sulaiman reveals that the authorities acknowledged that a slip-up was built, and that an explanation was delivered to him.
From a Facebook submit, Faiz Sulaiman explained that he was stopped at a police roadblock close to the Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport (Subang Airport), exactly where the law enforcement officer in attendance issued the summons for not displaying the bodily road tax sticker, and for not exhibiting the digital street tax on the MpJPJ cell application. Faiz operates a workshop, and the auto he was driving at the time belonged to a workshop purchaser.
A look at on the ministry of transportation internet site shows a record of routinely requested issues in reference to the MyJPJ application, which states that the download and use of the cellular app is optional, not obligatory.
The second merchandise on the record, which is more instantly suitable to the make a difference faced by Faiz, states that in the event the vehicle is pushed by someone who is not its owner, the electronic street tax may well be printed out and saved in the car (in the absence of the conventional road tax sticker).
It goes on to say that even if the driver fails to clearly show proof of highway tax documentation, it does not grow to be an offence as regulation enforcement staff will test the vehicle’s information via their gadget.
In insisting that the driver refers to the street transport section (JPJ) because of to remaining unable to entry the MyJPJ application on behalf of the car proprietor, the officer was performing in contradiction to the announcement produced by the transport minister.